About MichaelBaugh.com

Welcome to MichaelBaugh.com, my personal blog and repository for dog writing I’ve done here and there.  I guess now it’s all … here.

The blog is set up pretty simply.  To the right you will find categories for articles and essays I’ve written organized by source and subject.  Pieces with video are also listed under “video.” Articles and essays written exclusively for this site are categorized as “site original.”  Material by guest writers is stored under the author’s name and subject where applicable.

The latest postings are always directly below this one and listed to the right under “recent posts.”

Above there’s a little something about me and information about Michael’s Dogs Training and Behavior in Houston, TX.

Please link to this site freely and often.  :)

Posted in Site Original | Tagged | Comments Off

Lessons from the Living Room (Suffering)

One of my colleagues recently wrote this (paraphrasing):  Attempts at dog training often fail because the owner isn’t suffering or hasn’t suffered enough.  It’s a harsh statement, yes.  Nevertheless, it’s often quite true. Complacency inspires nothing, and nothing is quite as inspiring (and reinforcing) as suffering interrupted. My colleague is spot on.  Action is often borne of agony.  We trainers know the technical term for this: Negative Reinforcement.

We hear our clients begging for it all the time.  Make my dog stop (you fill in the blank).  He’s aggressive.  He’s out of control.  He has ADHD, dominance, and stubbornness.  At some point the labels we slap on things aren’t enough to ease the pain.  We call out for help.  We’ve suffered enough and it’s time for something to happen.

I work with people whose dogs have bitten people or other dogs.  If they haven’t bitten, they’ve growled or snarled or lunged.  These are good people; many are very good people.  They love their dogs.  “He’s a good dog,” they tell me.  Their voices are soft, pleading.  They mean it.  “I love him.  I just want him to stop this.“  And then they ask me why.  Why does he act this way?  Why is this happening?  Some cry.

Suffering shines a harsh light on things.  There is the world the way we hoped it would be.  Then there is the world the way it is.  Sometimes the two match up.  More often they don’t.  The humanistic psychologist Carl Rogers called this incongruence.  We form an ideal self, a perfect life; and then we struggle to conjure it into reality.  So I listen to people who love their dogs tell me about the life they dreamt.  “I got him for my son,” they say.  Or, “I just wanted a running buddy.”  Or, “I want to pet him, and cuddle.”  They pause.  “But ….”

Incongruence.  Suffering.  The dog bites, growls, lunges.  He won’t be touched.  He is not like the last dog, the perfect dog, the one from childhood.  This dog doesn’t match up.  “I love him.”  But.  More tears.

My colleague is a trainer emeritus of sorts.  Though not yet retired, he’s taken on the title early, a plainspoken Texas Man who’s found wisdom helping folks with their dogs over the past twenty-some years.  It’s strange, though no less profound, what we can learn from people and dogs in their living rooms.  Life is suffering.  The Buddha’s First Nobel Truth is frequently misunderstood.  The literal translation of suffering (dukkha) takes us a bit further than mere discontent.  Life’s pain is the hinge of change; it is temporary and conditional.  Incongruence, for Carl Rogers, was one of the first keys to change in our lives.  The beginning, not the end.  It puts us on notice that life is not what we expected or dreamed of, but that it is nonetheless our life.  For the Buddha it’s also about contrast.  Suffering leads us to compassion.

There are steps to helping dogs who are frightened and angry as a result, the ones who bite and all the rest.  They are not all that unlike the steps we take to help our fellow humans, small steps, gentle.  We begin wherever we are and move forward as best we can, slowly at first.  There is always a helper, a trainer like me or my colleague, friends.  And yes, there are the dreams for which we still reach, or the memories of the last dog, the perfect one, the one we mourn in the face of the one we have.  The wish.  The reality.

The lessons, taught well and practiced faithfully yield results.  The pain eases and the hinge moves more freely.  Behavior changes.  The dog does stop (fill in the blank), and new behavior replaces old.  Life imagined more closely matches life at hand.  People smile.  I wish them well and eventually move on to the next dog, to the next living room.

Sometimes I wonder if I’ll stay at this as long as my senior colleague.  It’s been nearly 30 years for him now.   Perhaps like me, he is drawn by what he learns as much as by what he teaches.   Life is dukkha.  Only when it’s crushed and ground does wheat transform to flour; and before it becomes bread flour is put to flame.  The work is hard at times.  I’ve cried for clients, even with them.  The lesson is compassion.  What else is to be learned from unavoidable suffering?  Smile kindly at the client who is pleading and questioning.  She is your teacher.  Love the dog who wants to hurt you.  His suffering is teaching you to care more effectively.  It is the grist that eventually feeds us.

Michael Baugh CDBC, CPDT-KSA teaches dog training in Houston, TX.  He specializes in counseling families with fearful and aggressive dogs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

‘Genius’ Misses the Mark

I cannot recommend The Genius of Dogs to anyone in good conscience.  That’s disappointing, since Brian Hare and his wife, Vanessa Woods actually turn some good phrases and tell some decent stories in the book.  It’s equally disappointing because Hare has done some interesting research into how dogs read and understand human signals.  Even the idea that dogs can infer meaning from our signals is fascinating, suggesting that they may be able to reason at some level.

Hare has done some notable preliminary work into how dogs think.  Like any good scientist, he’s focused and clearly states his focus.  “I am not so interested in fancy tricks and what dogs can be trained to do,” he writes, “I love seeing what a dogs do when they see a problem for the first time.”  That’s excellent.  I wish he had stopped there.

The trouble with Hare and Woods’ book is the unexpected and vitriolic attack against modern dog training.  The authors claim that Behaviorism (Skinner’s Operant Conditioning) is a relic of a bygone era.  The book gets more than a bit mean-spirited when Hare recalls speaking at a conference for dog trainers.  He’s aghast that modern trainers understand, use, and teach Behaviorism and Applied Behavior Analysis.  “It was like a spaceship landed and a whole bunch of aliens had jumped out and announced they were taking us all back to the fifties.”  He then goes on to write that the Skinnerian view of learning was long ago “rejected and replaced by a cognitive approach.”

The next segment of the book is called The Tyranny of Behaviorism in which Hare and Woods cast Skinner as an emotionless nerd wearing a white lab coat and thick glasses.  That may be true.  But they also claim, “Skinnerian principles are not useful as a basis for understanding and enjoying the company of your dog.”  That is simply not true.  There is nearly a century of data to indicate Learning Theory (Behaviorism) and Applied Behavior Analysis are cornerstones for understanding the nature of how all organisms learn and how we can influence behavior change.  For a deeper exploration into this subject, I recommend The Science of Consequences by Susan Schneider.

We could excuse Hare and Woods their errors.  After all, Hare’s own research is fascinating.  Add to that, in-fighting in the field of Psychology is legendary, albeit primarily a 20th Century phenomenon.  The Behaviorists rejected the Psychoanalysts (Freud and Jung); The Humanistic Psychologists (Carl Rogers, Fritz and Laura Perls, et al.) cast Behaviorism askew; The Cognitive Behaviorists (Aaron Beck and Albert Ellis) claimed superiority after that.  Hare’s myopic we’re number one cognitive approach to dogs is not exactly shocking.  Even the loosely woven concept he’s calling “cognitive training” for dogs is no jaw-dropper.  And the book’s companion for-profit “dognition” web site doesn’t exactly come with a spoiler alert either (have you seen the prices on there?).  We shouldn’t be surprised.  We could even excuse it, if the stakes weren’t so high.

In chapter 10, the authors describe how Hare tried to train his dog and failed.  It read like any number of emails I get from clients daily, “As soon as we were outside, or anywhere that mattered, I could just forget about it.  He would not sit or come when I called him.”  What was Hare’s explanation for this inability to learn?  The dog had a blue tongue, and was therefore a Chow mix.  I threw the book across the room.  (No, seriously, I did).  Hare is by many accounts a brilliant man.  He has a doctorate degree, which is more than I can say for myself.  His area of study is animal cognition, and I don’t dispute his rigor as a scientist.  Nevertheless, I was stunned when the book began to slip into this weird and fantastical mythology (I daresay I was experiencing some cognitive dissonance).  Hare’s solution to his dog’s errors was to castrate him (not a bad idea), and then everything was okay.   There was no teaching the dog; that failed.  The dog was flawed, inexplicably so until the hormones were cut off.  All this is in a popular book (and companion web site) highly promoted to the general public.  It’s dangerous.

How so?  “As we’ve seen,” the book says, as if it were long-established fact, “animals make inferences.”  That means dogs get it.  They know things, our signals, and our intentions.  They are, as the book suggests, interested in pleasing us.  They are special, our partners in co-evolution.  For more than 200 pages the authors outline the unique Genius of Dogs, weaving tales of impressive studies – and to be fair, debunking some mistruths along the way.  Still, by the end of the book we are left with an image of our own dogs as not only intelligent, but knowing (from the Latin cognitus – known).  So, If my dog “knows” what I want, then why doesn’t he listen to me?  I can hear my clients asking me now.  Hare uses the word “stubborn” in reference to his own dog, the same label my clients use.  He also speaks of dominant members of feral packs of dogs.  Sigh; are we back to that again?

I can tell you that we can teach dogs to listen and even to follow our leadership if that’s your bent.  But Hare throws that notion out the window when he aggressively attacks the science of learning (Behaviorism).   He tells us dogs should and do know us.  Then he strips his readers – some of whom I fear are quiet naïve – of the most tested and proven tenets of teaching their own dogs.  What are we left with?  A thin construct called “cognitive training” and a web site with celebrity endorsements from Victoria Stillwell and Nina Ottosson.  That will be $147 please.

The stakes are high.  When people think their dogs know what do to but are refusing, they get angry.  When they want to teach their dogs but then read that the industry standard for training dogs is false, they become helpless.  Helpless and angry are a dangerous combination in humans, and dogs suffer from it.  We humans like shiny new things – fresh – cutting edge.  That’s what this book promised.  Unfortunately, even notions that are wrong-minded sell in the marketplace of ideas so long as they are packaged well.  We need look no further than the success of Cesar Milan to see that truth.

And now we have The Genius of Dogs, a toxic if not intoxicating blend of science, pseudoscience, and lies.  I wanted to love this book.  I ended up hating it.  But more than anything, I think it just scares the hell out of me.

 

Michael Baugh CDBC, CPDT-KSA teaches dog training in Houston, TX.  

Posted in Site Original | Tagged , | 11 Comments

The Whole Truth (so help me dog)

Truth is a slippery thing, subject to so much bias and spin.  We know that all too well after the recently past and long suffered political season.  And, those of us who work in the community of dogs and their people know it particularly well.

We dog people are an emotional lot, and emotion is so often what clouds truth.   We take on beliefs about our dogs and shore up those beliefs with what we see on TV or read on the Internet.  It’s called confirmation bias; we hold true to an opinion and that belief is strengthened every time we hear it repeated elsewhere.  A natural human process called cognitive dissonance blocks contradictory ideas; information that doesn’t support out beliefs is disruptive to our mental processes and set aside as false.  We are, it seems, not a reliable filter for truth.

In the world of dog training there is a great deal of bias and dissonance.  Some believe quite strongly that dogs learn from a social structure similar to that of wolves.  The idea is that wolves and dogs both form linear pack hierarchies lead by alpha males and females.  Humans teach dogs by showing their social dominance and become leader of the pack.  It’s the basis for Cesar Milan’s approach, and that of many other trainers.

Still other trainers believe with equal vigor that dogs learn based on clearly communicated criteria and consequences.  The idea is that dogs learn the same way all other animals learn, based on whether or not any given action is reinforced or punished.  This is called Behaviorism.  It’s rooted in the early 20th century work of John Watson and B.F. Skinner.

Add to that other ideas.  Many feel quite strongly that they can communicate intuitively with dogs both living and dead.  Closely related is the idea that dogs have a sixth sense that allows them to know and understand us at a very deep, even unconscious level.  This belief suggests dogs learn in a much more humanlike way, that they already understand what we mean and intend.  For some, dogs even become mystical creatures, romanticized as much as they are beloved.

What’s the truth?   It’s a slippery thing, especially when it mixes with strongly held emotional beliefs.  The closest thing we have now to truth is the vigorous work of science.  Contrary to what many believe, science is not a list of answers but a constant questioning.  It is the search for truth, proposing possibilities and testing them against reality.  An idea is tested, measured, and then presented for scrutiny.  Others then test the idea as well, measure, and present.  Ideas that test and measure what they clearly intend to are considered valid.  Those that are tested many times by others with identical results are considered reliable.  Validity and reliability are the hallmarks of good science.

When it comes to how dogs learn, I lean deeply into science.  Some questions have been asked for nearly a century with valid and reliable answers.  Dogs (all animals) do learn based consequences.  Presented with a given situation, dogs will behave (act) in a way that reflects the consequences of that behavior in the past.  Dogs who get treats when the come when called tend to come when called more often.  We’ve taught dogs in this way, perhaps for hundreds of years.

Newer studies within the past decade indicated that dogs do not form packs with alpha males and females.  In fact, we are gaining new understanding that suggests wild wolves don’t either, at least not in the way we once thought. Wolf packs are more like a family with a father and mother; the rest of the pack is made up of their offspring who remain with them for a year or more.  The idea that dogs are trying to ascend to leadership of our human families has never been shown to be true.  These early studies are promising in terms of their validity.  More research will be needed to bear out their reliability.

The idea of animal communication is intriguing.  It speaks to our attraction to things mystical and unknown.  Mystery and questioning were the very things from which science was born.  Still, there has been little research in this area.  That said, there is early evidence that dogs can read our facial expressions and body language expertly, better even than chimpanzees can.  That can look very much like evidence of a sixth sense to us, but is it more likely the very deft use of the dog’s existing five senses.

What then is the truth?  How does it settle with our beliefs?  To what can we grasp firmly when so much seems all too slippery?  My answer follows the vigorous work of questioning.  Lean into the science.  It’s where faith finds firm rooting.  Science is the universal codex of great things divine.

And what better way to explore the divine than through our dogs.

 

Posted in Site Original, Uncategorized | Comments Off

The Nonsense of No

We all do it: fuss at our dogs, yell at them to stop doing this or that.  More often than not our rants begin with a sharp stern “NO!”  The funny thing is with most of our dogs the “no” results in nary a pause in the action, a look of glum recognition followed by more of whatever it is we wanted him to stop doing.   The sad truth is, “no” is a nonstarter.  It doesn’t work.   And yet we keep barking away.  “NO!”

The main problem with “no,” of course, is that it’s devoid of any instructive content.  What does “no” mean?   If a dog is jumping on our guest, for instance, and we yell “no” what are we communicating to the dog?  Maybe we’re letting him know we’re angry, but we’re not conveying even an inkling of what we want him to do.  Part of the reason is because “no” means so many things to us.  We yell it when the dog is jumping up, but also when he’s running away, digging, barking, and pulling on his leash.  It’s too vague.  It also violates one of the golden rules of dog training:  a command can only have one meaning, not many.  Inference, creating meaning out of context, clues, and the subtleties of language is a uniquely human quality (and not always one of our best).

Of course, we humans are clever.  So we add the offending behavior after the word “no” to help our dogs understand our indignation.  We say “no jump,” or “no bark.”  In my many years as a dog trainer, and the many more as a human being on this planet, I’ve never heard a dog use a verbal language.  The idea that our dog understands our particular meaning of the word “jump,” much less its antithesis, is a huge leap of logic (pun fully intended).  They are linear, not relational, thinkers.  Plus they follow visual cues better than words.  Never mind the minutiae of behavior science.  Yelling no-anything just makes us sound like cartoon cavemen.  It’s silly.

So what are we wordy creatures to do?  We just want our dogs to STOP IT (whatever it is).  Are we hopeless?  No.  Let’s try this instead.  What do we want our dogs to do?  When our dog is jumping, what would we prefer he was doing?  Sit, perhaps.  We can teach that.  “Sit”, when taught properly generally has one meaning (place bottom on ground).  Awesome!  I can teach my dog to sit, and if he jumps on a guest I have something clear and meaningful to yell at him.  “Sit!”  His bottom hits the ground – jumping ceases.  It might take some practice, sure, but the meaning is clear.  Do this, not that.

Some of us will still yell out “no” in anger (move me to the head of the mea culpa line).  That’s okay if we just remember this.  Follow up with a clear instruction.  If we see a dog digging a hole in the back yard, we might bark out “no” in our justified anger.  But then what?  Add meaningful instruction.  “Stella, come.”  Stella is my dog’s name and she has a pretty decent coming-when-called.  It’s liable to get her away from the hole, at least long enough for me to get her on to a new task.  “No” is quickly forgotten.  The instructive part was calling her to me.

Try this, too.  When your dog does something right, pick a word that means they’re getting a tasty bit of food.  The word should be short and crisp, timed exactly with the good deed to let them know a food reward is on the way.  That’ll get them learning.  Actions result in delicious consequences.  The word marks the moment of success.  Of course, I have a favorite word for this kind of teaching.  “Yes.”

Michael Baugh CDBC, CPDT-KSA teaches dog training in Houston and Katy, TX.  He specializes in behavior related to canine fear and aggression.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Men and Their Dogs

Michael Baugh CDBC, CPDT-KSA

Maybe it’s a guy thing.  It could be that whole a boy and his dog ethos.  There’s just something different about how we guys bond with our dogs.  Don’t get me wrong.  I know women love their dogs too.  It just seems like many men take the connection past special into the realm of mythical.

Stella! Photo courtesy Robyn Arouty Photography

I teach dog training in Houston and in Katy.  As it turns out, I have a lot of male clients, and have been thinking a lot recently about dogs and the men who love them.  I don’t know what it is, but we do love them differently.

Part of it, I think, is the shock. I met a guy recently who had a new puppy. It was clear to me right away that this man did not like the puppy, who was biting him, barking, and misbehaving in all the typical ways.  Puppies can be annoying, but this man was beyond annoyed.  He was mourning.  It turns out his last dog had died only a few months prior.  A well-meaning friend bought the puppy as a “replacement.”  During our coaching session I asked the man to call the puppy to him.  Without thinking, he called out the name of his late dog.  His chin quivered and he said, “damn.”  The sadness is not surprising. The shock is how deeply the loss resonates, how powerfully he’d attached to his old dog.  His buddy.

They find places in our hearts we didn’t know existed.  A lot of us guys play our cards pretty close to the chest.  That’s especially true for a veteran I had the pleasure of working with.  He has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  One day he asked me to take a picture of him with his dog, but he warned me he never smiles.  It’s part of the condition, he said.  I played along.  Truth is, I’d seen him smiling at his dog more times than I could count. The dog was reaching into places no psychiatrist or psychologist could ever reach.  He was touching the man’s soul.  Healing him.

We are defenders of our dogs, sometimes to a fault.  I know a man whose hard lines soften every time he looks at his Chihuahua mix.  It doesn’t matter that the dog pees everywhere in the house.  The dog is special.  One of my dear clients is spending his senior years with a Papillion in an assisted living facility.  The dog bites strangers, including the man’s caregivers.  That doesn’t matter.  He’s going to make sure the dog is with him to the end.

Maybe it’s not a case of men being different than woman.  We all have the capacity to fall for our dogs, and fall hard.  It just seems that men live the story a bit differently.  We are so surprised when these dogs break through to find the men we never knew we could become. Once they’re in our hearts, we elevate them, make them into a dog like no other, and tell stories about them.  Write novels, memoirs and movies.

I don’t know.  Maybe it is a guy thing.  The boy and his dog, but in this story the boy is all grown up.  The dog, it seems, is usually pretty much the same, a hero rescuing him from the deep well of his day-to-day life.  It’s the mythical dog incarnate, real, right here, right now.

Houston Dog Trainer Michael Baugh specializes in behavior solutions for fearful and aggressive dogs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

To Hug or Not?

If you spend any time on Facebook you’re going to see the pictures – people hugging their dogs, kissing their dogs, lounging on their dogs, even kids riding dogs.  The human faces are all aglow with rapturous bliss.  More often than not, however, the dog looks like he just wants to get the heck out of there.  Of course, most of us are oblivious.  Let’s not forget that ignorance is part of what makes the bliss so wonderful.  I mean that in the nice way.  We love our dogs.  We just don’t seem to know what they like and don’t like.

 I’ve been guilty myself.  That picture of me and Stella is the most glaring evidence.  I’m all this is great.  She’s all please just let this be over soon.  Look at her face, the eyes, the way she’s actually leaning away from me.  Her ears are pulled back, too.  That’s another sign.  You don’t have to believe the picture, though.  Right after that shot was taken Stella started to wiggle her way free of my loving arms.

Nobody wants to be a party pooper, but here’s the bottom line.  Dogs and humans don’t exactly show affection the same way.   We drape our arms around the shoulders of people we like.  To a primate (including human primates) nothing says you’re special like a hug.  To a dog, it can feel like a threat.  Watch what happens when a dog drapes his head over the shoulders of another dog.  Trouble.  That’s not to say dogs don’t learn to tolerate our hugs; they do.  But it doesn’t come naturally to them.

Author Patricia McConnell (The Other End of the Leash) was one of the first to point out this kind of miscommunication between people and dogs.  Humans are all about reaching with arms and touching with hands.  Dogs have neither.  They greet with noses, mouths, tongues and teeth.  It’s an odd pairing, no doubt.

Still, all is not lost.  There’s lots of evidence to suggest that dogs love to be touched.   In fact, the sense of touch is among the very first senses to develop in newborn puppies.  They root to nurse.  Feeling is essential to surviving.  That lives on in their relationships with us, and many dogs are quite cuddly and enjoy a good evening on the sofa with their favorite person.

Like people, though, dogs are individuals.  Some have sensitivities to being reached for or touched, much less hugged.  Many dogs have little or no experience with the way we humans show affection.  Our ways may be scary to them even if our hearts are in the right place.  A child lounging with his head on a dog’s chest may look postcard cute.  But for the dog it might be more than a little freaky.  That, along with hugs, can get a child bitten.  I know.  I’m the guy people call when their dog bites their child.

So what are we to do?  We have so much love to give and so do our dogs.  Here are some tips for a good, affectionate relationship with your dog.

Listen to your dog by watching your dog.  Your dog’s language isn’t verbal; it’s visual.  When you initiate some sort of physical interaction with your dog, watch to see how he responds.  Does he snuggle closer, or does he walk away?  If he does the latter, that means he’s not comfortable.  Wide-open frightened eyes, ducking head, ears pulled back flat are all signs too.  Some dogs also wrinkle their foreheads when they are worried.  Notice those things and then give your dog a break.  He’s communicating with you.  You’re his friend so respond by giving him a little space.

Let your dog make choices.  If your dog doesn’t want to snuggle and chooses to walk away – let him.  It’s not personal.  Try this.  Begin some sort of physical contact, like petting your dog’s face, and then stop.  What does your dog do next?  Does he nudge your hand for more petting?  That’s a choice that says more please.  Let your dog make choices and respect those, especially if his choice is to disengage for a while.  Never force physical contact.   He’ll come around.

Be your dog’s advocate.  Not every dog will want to interact with every person.  This is especially true when it comes to children.  If you notice your dog trying to communicate that he doesn’t want to be touched or approached, speak up on his behalf.  It’s okay to ask a person to stop petting your dog, or even to step away from your dog.  It’s is essential that you interrupt a child who is making your dog uncomfortable.  That’s a safety issue.

If a dog is really uncomfortable, he will let us know in all the quiet ways we see in those facebook pictures – wide eyes, clenched jaw, tense or leaning away.  If we ignore those, a growl or warning snap may follow.  And yes, people do get bitten by their own dogs.  It’s children mostly, hugging, kissing or riding the family dog.

We teach our dogs how to deal with our quirky human ways.  We have to really.  While hugging and having their head patted may not come naturally to most dogs, many still learn to tolerate it – even like it.  If we’re lucky we learn each other’s limits and work it out.  If we’re very lucky we get some of those amazing moments that only dog lovers understand, magical instances where we really connect with our dogs.  Sometimes it’s just a look. We’re not even touching at all.  If only someone had a camera.  We’d show the world.

  Originally published in Houston PetTalk Magazine, June 2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Crate Training Instructions

Crate training is a great way to manage your dog’s behavior.  You will know he is safely confined during those times you are not actively supervising or training.  The crate can also be your dog’s favorite safe place to get away from the noise and activity of family life.  A crate is also the safest way to transport your dog in a car or SUV.

Here’s how you can train your dog to love being in the crate.

  1. Leave the door to your dog’s crate off or open.
  2. Tell your dog “go in you crate.”
  3. Then, toss a morsel of treat in the crate.
  4. Your dog should peek in the crate to get the treat.
  5. Say “Yes” before your dog eats the treat.
  6. Repeat.
  • In time stop throwing a treat.  Instead say “go in your crate” and then gesture as if you were tossing a treat in.  Yes and treat when your dog complies.
  • Practice short trial periods  with your dog in the crate before trying long durations.
  • Always leave a yummy chew toy (stuffed Kong) in the crate with your dog.
  • Never open the crate when your dog is barking, crying or scratching.  Wait for that behavior to stop even for a moment, then release your dog.
  • Never leave your dog in the crate for over 8 hours.  This time period will be significantly shorter for puppies (see potty training)

 

  • Watch this video on making the crate a favorite place.

Feeding your dog exclusively in the crate using a fully stuffed Kong Toy will help make the crate extra special.  Keep these crate sessions to a minute or less at first, picking up the Kong before it is fully finished.

Posted in Site Original | Tagged , | Comments Off

Touch Me Not

Michael Baugh CPDT-KSA, CDBC

It’s one of the most uncomfortable things for us trainers to say to a client.  I am always looking for the kindest and most tactful way to say it.  “I don’t think your dog really enjoys being patted on the head like that.”  It’s tough because the thing is, we humans love to pat and pet and paw on our dogs.

Ethologist and Author Patricia McConnell PhD was one of the first to shine the light on this basic disconnect between humans and dogs.   We humans are primates.  Our social interactions are played out primarily with our arms and hands.  Dogs are canines and they are notably lacking arms and hands.  Their social interactions are played out with their whole bodies, but primarily with their mouths.  So, it’s no surprise then to find new puppy owners bloodied on their limbs and digits baffled over why their young bundles of teeth keep biting them.  It’s also no surprise to see a dog duck away when their person reaches out to pat their head.

Here’s the rub (literally and figuratively).  Even when we know better, we humans keep on keeping on.  We don’t get it, even when we get it.  Case in point: that picture of me and Stella over there.  My face says, I love this dog.  Her face says, I don’t care just get me out of here.  I knew better but I just couldn’t stop myself.  Facebook and Google are littered with videos and pictures like this one, and worse.  People hugging dogs who clearly are uncomfortable.  Children draped over dogs who are at best tolerating the interaction.  We can’t help ourselves.  Almost daily we’re highlighting the difference between our species, photographing it, and publishing it for the world to see.

Sometimes I chuckle at myself when I forget and reach for Stella’s head for a nice pat.   She, of course, ducks away and I apologize.  The laugh is on me.  I knew better and couldn’t help myself.  Dogs tend to not like hands reaching for them; especially hands belonging to someone they don’t know too well.  Some dogs are more sensitive than others (Stella knows me well and still doesn’t care for that kind of greeting).  We forget because quite often we greet each other, including strangers, with an extended hand.  We call it shaking hands.  If we know each other even a little bit better, or if we’re in Europe, we might hug.  Hugs to dogs are very alien and offensive.  Dogs who drape their heads over another dog’s withers (shoulder area) often get in fights.  So do dogs who full-on mount another dog (sort of like hugging).

People who reach for the wrong dog get bitten too.  Sometimes the results are serious.  Children, unfortunately get bitten most frequently.  They’re the ones most likely to hug or even try to ride a dog.  It pains me to know some parents don’t know better and actually encourage this.  They grab the camera and log on to Facebook.  I cringe.  At least one dog related fatality this year involved a baby pulling himself up on a dog.  Those cases are rare and extreme.  It’s easy to blame the dog or the parents.  The truth though is that we all need to learn better ways to interact with dogs;  we trainers especially need to take the lead on this – teach – learn – teach again.  No one who loves their child and loves their dog wants things to go badly.  But it happens.

This doesn’t mean dogs don’t like to be touched.  Most do.  When I’m thinking correctly, I let dogs approach me first.   If the dog appears fearful, I’ll turn sideways to the dog, and I might bend at the knees to get down to his level.  I don’t reach into the dog’s space or make direct eye contact, the way you might do when you’re greeting a person at a business meeting.  If the dog approaches, I pet him on the chest or on the cheek by his ears.  Watch to see how he reacts.  If he backs away, I stop.  Of course, the overwhelming majority of dogs will love this.  Many will be exuberant and jump for joy (that’s another issue altogether).  Children are always supervised.  In Stella’s case, because she is particularly sensitive, interactions with kids are structured and brief.

Trainer educator Jean Donaldson got it right in The Culture ClashWe want our dogs to be like dogs the in the movies.  She calls them Disney Dogs.  They are cute and always nice, with human sensibilities and manners.  That, of course, is a myth.  Dogs have their own ways, their own sensibilities, and they are nonetheless still cute and nice.  I think they are more so.  Nearly perfect in fact.  I should remember that when I see a dear client looming over her dog and reaching out.  “Your dog is wonderful, and so are you.  Let me show you how he likes to greet people.  He’s so cute.

“Wait, I’ll get the camera.”

Posted in Human-Canine Bond, Problem Behavior, Puppies, Site Original | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Just Plain Ordinary Dogs

Michael Baugh CPDT-KSA, CDBC

It always comes down to this for me.  Would I live with that dog?  You see, I don’t endorse dogs for adoption lightly; that’s bad business for dog trainers.  If I’m going to put my name behind a dog, he or she has to be a dog I’d honestly and freely welcome into my own home.  I’m also not the kind of dog trainer who adopts rehab cases.  I want to live with a just-plain typical dog, magical yes, but in the way ordinary dogs find magic by settling deep into your heart.

My dogs are those kind of dogs.  They are mutts, as we used to call such gifts, mixed breeds of questionable origin.  But, this isn’t really about them.  It’s not about my adopting a dog either; our house and our hearts are full.  This is about other ordinary dogs, magical dogs with no home, mutts whose origins and looks draw their worth into question.  They are dogs who’ve touched my heart and even now risk breaking it.

Tara

When I posted pictures of Tara and Oreo on my facebook page, my brother posted only one question about them.  “Are they pit bull mixes?”  The question made me angry, and at first I wasn’t exactly sure why.  My answer to him was staid.  Breed identification based on visual observation is only about 30% accurate.  He didn’t reply.

I met Tara and Oreo more than two months ago.  They were scrappy adolescent dogs pulled from the streets of the Corridor of Cruelty in Houston and placed directly into a boarding facility.  Oreo was literally a mangy mutt, black and white, slightly squared at the jaw.  Tara was and is brown and muscular with a blocky head and slanted amber eyes.  My job was to assess them and a third dog, a shepherd mix named Skipper, for a program called Project HEEL.  The program places homeless dogs from Corridor Rescue Inc. with teenage boys in the custody of The Harris County Juvenile Probation Department.  When I first met them, the three dogs ran amok and were definitely untrained.  Nevertheless, they got along well and within a week they were sent off to a juvenile probation home in the rural reaches of a Houston Suburb.

Oreo

It’s hard to ignore the parallels – tough-looking dogs with tough-looking teenage boys, all behind the double locked doors and barbed wire of the county.  For the dogs and the boys both, the trouble is more about how they look, than what they’ve done or ever will do.  The boys at least know what they’re up against when they get out.  The dogs have no idea.  Block headed, bully bodied, banned in some places.  They are totally, if not blissfully, unaware of how hard it will be for them to find a place in this world, a home, a family.

Someone claimed Skipper, the shepherd mix, weeks before Project HEEL ended.  Skipper’s leash will be handed to his new guardians at a graduation ceremony.  No one will take Tara’s leash, or Oreo’s leash, the ones my brother summarily asked about.  They will return to their crates, and if time runs out they will go back to the boarding facility to wait.  I don’t know for how long.  I also don’t know if they are pit mixes.  It doesn’t matter.  They look the part and that’s enough of a mark against them.  And here’s the irony , bitter as it may be.

I’d live with either of these dogs, Tara, Oreo.  I would if it weren’t for the dogs who’ve already claimed me.  Tara, tough as she may look, with her muscled body and serious eyes, would have a place beside me – curled and pressed against my chest please.  Oreo would learn tricks and accompany me on TV, the eager learner, the clown.  I’ve looked at each of them squarely and asked myself soberly, would I live with that dog.  The answer is yes.  I’d put my name behind either of theirs, and let them settle into my heart to find the magic life of an ordinary dog.

I don’t endorse dogs lightly, but these are dogs with whom I’d live.  Wouldn’t you?  Won’t you?  Please.

Posted in Human-Canine Bond, Site Original | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Food is not a Four Letter Word

Michael Baugh CPDT-KSA, CDBC

Originally published in the January-February 2012 issue of Houston PetTalk Magazine

The question isn’t whether or not you can train your dog with food.  That’s pretty much a no-brainer.  Author and long-time animal trainer Dr. Grey Stafford put it best.  “If you’ve ever fed your dog, you’ve trained with food.”  Dogs have learned to do all sorts of things for their food bowl, including beg, spin in circles and jump on people.  What seems strange is that so many people would sooner give their dog a bowl of food for all that annoying behavior, than use small bits of food to teach desired behavior.  There seems to be a disconnect.  Feeding is good.  Food in training is bad.  Even some self-professed trainers advertise that they don’t use food in training.  Why?  Dr. Stafford inspired the title of this article when he made the claim that should be common sense to all of us.  Food is not a four-letter word.

Here’s how positive reinforcement training works.   If your dog spins in circles and barks, and the result is that you give him a heaping bowl of food, then he’s going to do more spinning and barking in the future.  It’s that simple.  Our dogs will keep doing the stuff we pay for.  In fact, it’s science (See “The Science of Dog Training, Houston PetTalk Magazine, March 2011).  Dr. Susan Friedman is a professor of psychology at Utah State University and an animal behavior consultant.   She cuts right to the meat of the matter.  “If behavior has no effect, what are we behaving for?”  So why not use the effect to our advantage?   Dog sits – food – more sitting.  Dog comes when called – food – more coming when called.  The list goes on.

Do you always have to have food with you?  No.  But (there’s always a “but”), it doesn’t hurt.  As your dog learns good manners, he may only get food every once in a while.  Rover Oaks Trainer Aki Yamaguchi CPDT-KA calls that “phasing out the food.”  Use food to show your dog how to do new things (trainers call it luring), but don’t get stuck in a long-term pattern of bribing.  Yamaguchi says, “You should put the food out of sight as soon as possible.”  Keep it handy but hidden.  Dr. Stafford speaks from experience, “I’ve trained hundreds of animals covering more species than I can recall.  The one lesson I’ve learned is the ultimate power of positive reinforcement, whether you train dogs or dolphins, is in its unpredictability.”  That means your dog will get paid for doing things you like, but not always how and when he expects it.  Any dog knows to come running when you’re wearing a treat bag, but try sneaking a few treats in your pocket, and then call your dog while you’re brushing your teeth or watering the lawn.  He’ll be mighty surprised when you hand him that food for a job well done.  Now, that’s unpredictability.

Is food the only way you can reinforce your dog’s behavior?  No.  But, some of the most potent reinforcers speak directly to the animal’s biological needs.  We call those primary reinforcers, and they include food, shelter, reproduction, and control (the ability to make choices).  In dog training food just happens to be the easiest primary reinforcer to deliver.  Aki Yamaguchi says, “Food is often my first choice when teaching simple behaviors because you can get a lot more repetitions.” Modern trainers like Aki pair the food with praise, petting, and sometimes a clicker.  Those are called secondary reinforcers.  In time, praise, petting, and clicks will take on some of the built-in value of the food.  That’s a good thing.  You’ll want lots of possible reinforcers in your training tool kit.

What will your dog work for?  Some dogs love food.  But, other dogs will work for the chance to fetch a ball, play tug, or cuddle on the sofa.  Still other dogs learn to love petting and praise. Dr. Friedman notes, “It’s a teacher’s job to notice that individuality and use it well. The more reinforcers a learner has the more enriched its life can be.”  Aki Yamaguchi agrees. “Your job is to find what motivates your dog and use it to get the behaviors you want from him.” Pay your dog for doing great things in lots of different ways, and see how that adds to the unpredictability you’re looking for.  Your dog will work harder and learn faster because he’s always wondering, what am I going to get this time?

Is training all about the food?  No, and there’s no “but” about it.  Using food, pairing it with praise and fun, teaching your dog what pays and what doesn’t – that’s all about your discovering how to better communicate with your dog.  It’s about learning new things, looking for the next task, and loving every minute of it together.

Posted in Houston Pet Talk Magazine, How Dogs Learn | Tagged , , , | Comments Off